Bilateral III: MEM-SMEs Demand Clarity, Not Ideology

10.02.2026 | from Swissmechanic Schweiz

Time Reading time: 2 minutes


Swissmechanic Schweiz

10.02.2026, MEM-SMEs neither fundamentally reject nor wholeheartedly endorse the Bilateral III agreements. A recent survey conducted by Swissmechanic in collaboration with BAK Economics reveals: the businesses' stance is shaped by economic prudence, institutional skepticism, and a strong need for clarity and predictability.


The public debate regarding the Bilateral III agreements is frequently conducted along political lines. However, the perspective of SMEs in the mechanical, electrical, and metal industries is more nuanced. For them, stable and reliable relations with the European Union are a central component of economic reality - both in terms of sales markets and procurement, value chains, and investment decisions.

Experiences with the Bilateral I and II agreements are predominantly viewed as beneficial by the majority of surveyed companies. Also, with the Bilateral III agreements, many MEM-SMEs recognize the potential benefits, particularly regarding secured market access, the reduction of technical trade barriers, and long-term planning and supply security. Nonetheless, they meet the institutional framework of the new agreements with skepticism. This skepticism is less based on negative practical experiences and more on concerns about additional administrative burdens and potential over-fulfillment of European requirements ('Swiss Overcompliance').

Uncertainty about the concrete impacts of Bilateral III on their own business is currently particularly pronounced. Many SMEs find the package of agreements difficult to understand. About every second company indicates a need for additional information - especially for concise, practice-oriented content and in-depth information on the economic impacts on their sector.

The results also reveal a clear link between the level of information and assessment: as understanding increases, uncertainty and skepticism significantly decrease. Well-informed companies take clear positions, weighing opportunities more heavily than risks, while less well-informed SMEs show a reservation marked by uncertainty about the impacts of the Bilateral agreements.

The survey makes it clear: MEM-SMEs expect not political slogans but transparent information, reliable framework conditions, and a realistic assessment of practical implementation. Swissmechanic will continue to bring the concerns of companies into the political discussion in a fact-based manner and address the high demand for information in a targeted way.

Editor's note: Image rights belong to the respective publisher.


Conclusion of this article: « Bilateral III: MEM-SMEs Demand Clarity, Not Ideology »

Swissmechanic Schweiz

Swissmechanic is the employers' association (politics, economy, education) for SMEs in the MEM sector (mechanical, electrical, and metal). It includes mechanical-technical and electrotechnical-electronic professional groups as well as industry and professional organizations in Switzerland and Liechtenstein.

The focus of the Swissmechanic association policy is aligned with the needs of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), whether they are suppliers, manufacturers of their own products, or service providers. The association was founded on June 17, 1939, on the grounds of the national exhibition in Zurich.

The umbrella organization Swissmechanic comprises 13 independent sections, a national organization (Swissmechanic Switzerland in Weinfelden, TG), and additionally associated organizations.

Note: The "About Us" text is taken from public sources or from the company profile on HELP.ch.

Source: Swissmechanic Schweiz, Press release

Original article published on: Bilaterale III: MEM-KMU verlangen Klarheit, nicht Ideologie