Winter Tyre Test 2026: Significant Differences in Safety and Durability

22.09.2026 | from Touring Club Suisse (TCS)

Time Reading time: 4 minutes


Touring Club Suisse (TCS)
Image rights: Touring Club Schweiz/Suisse/Svizzero - TCS

22.09.2026, Vernier/Ostermundigen - TCS tested 32 winter tyres in two sizes, revealing significant differences on wet roads. In small car tyres tested, the difference between the shortest and longest braking distances from 80 km/h is nearly 18 metres. TCS strongly advises against six mid-range tyre models based on the test results. However, there are also winners.


Winter tyres are specifically designed for cold temperatures and road conditions involving snow, ice, and wetness, ensuring high safety during winter months.

In the current test, the Testing & Technology department of the Touring Club Suisse examined 16 models each in the sizes 185/65 R15 88T/H and 225/50 R17 98V. The tyres were evaluated on 19 test criteria in the two main categories: 'driving safety' and 'environmental performance'. Test vehicles used were a Skoda Fabia and an Audi A4 Avant.

Small car tyres: Two models 'highly recommended'

The size 185/65 R15 88T/H is suitable for small cars like the VW Polo, Audi A1, Hyundai i20, Renault Clio, Citroën C3, Skoda Fabia, or Toyota Yaris.

Leading with 'highly recommended' are the Continental WinterContact TS 870 and the Michelin Alpin 7. Both particularly impress in driving safety. Rated 'recommended' are the Hankook Winter i*cept RS3, Linglong Sport Master Winter, Optimo Winter Touring OW41, Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3, and GT Radial WinterPro2 Evo. Various weaknesses, especially on dry roads and, for LingLong, additionally on winter roads, prevent a better rating for these five models.

The Bridgestone Blizzak LM 005, Nokian Tyres Snowproof 2, Vredestein Wintrac, Barum Polaris 6, Kumho WinterCraft WP52+, and Viking WinTech NewGen are rated 'conditionally recommended'. The Bridgestone notably displays a contrast between excellent wet performance and low durability. The Sunny Winter-max NW611, Atlas Polarbear HP, and Rockblade Rock 868S are 'not recommended'. All three show poor performance on wet roads.

Almost 18 metres difference in braking distance

The relevance of differences for safety is highlighted by an emergency brake from 80 km/h on wet asphalt. The Bridgestone Blizzak LM 005 stops after 33.5 metres. The same vehicle needs 51.4 metres with the Rockblade Rock 868S. This is 17.9 metres more braking distance. At the point where the vehicle with the Bridgestone has already stopped, the one with the Rockblade is still moving at around 47 km/h.

Notable are also the comparatively low durability figures for this size. On average, the predicted durability is around 31,000 kilometres. The Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ achieves the highest value with around 40,000 kilometres, the Bridgestone the lowest with around 22,400 kilometres. No tyre in this size achieves an 'overall good' rating in the environmental performance.

Mid-range tyres: Four models at the top

The size 225/50 R17 98V is used on vehicles like the Audi A4 and A5, Skoda Octavia, Peugeot 3008 and 5008, and various BMW and Mercedes models. Here, the result at the top end is better: Four tyres are 'highly recommended', six 'recommended'. However, six models are 'not recommended'.

The best results are achieved by the Pirelli Cinturato Winter 3 and the Continental WinterContact TS 870. Both impress on both driving safety and environmental performance. The Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 and the Michelin Alpin 7 are also 'highly recommended'.

TCS rates the Bridgestone Blizzak 6, Hankook Winter i*cept RS3, ESA+TECAR Supergrip Pro2, Dunlop Winter, Vredestein Wintrac Pro+, and Yokohama BluEarth Winter V906 as 'recommended'. The new Dunlop especially stands out with the best environmental performance of the entire test field but cannot quite keep up with the top-tier tyres in driving safety.

TCS advises against six models

The Falken Eurowinter HS02 Pro, Toyo Tires Observe EWS1, Tracmax Ice-Plus S210, Aptany RW211, Royal Black Royalwinter UHP, and Sunwide Snowide are rated as 'not recommended'. All six only achieve a poor rating in driving safety. Large weaknesses are noticeable on the winter roads with Falken and Toyo. Tracmax and Aptany, notably, fall short on wet or winter roads. Royal Black and Sunwide show significant deficits on both dry and wet roads.

Differences in braking are also apparent here. On wet asphalt, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 and the Pirelli Cinturato Winter 3 come to a stop from 80 km/h after 34.7 metres. The Sunwide Snowide requires 46.3 metres.

Test criteria

For 'driving safety', which accounts for 70% of the overall assessment, tyres were tested on dry, wet, and winter roads. Driving behaviour, braking performance, aquaplaning, and performance on snow and ice were scrutinized. 'Environmental performance' contributes 30% to the overall score and considers durability, tyre abrasion, efficiency, noise, and sustainability. TCS thereby not only assesses individual peak performances but evaluates the overall package of a tyre under different conditions.

TCS Tips for tyre selection

TCS recommends tyres that have received at least a 'recommended' rating in the test.
Winter tyres should have a minimum remaining tread depth of 4 millimetres in autumn. The two-franc test is an easy way to check this.
When buying tyres, do not focus solely on price or brand. Personal requirements on driving safety, durability, and environmental performance are crucial.
New tyres should preferably be no older than three years. The production date is given by the DOT code.
Four tyres of the same model and type should always be used.
Modern safety assistants do not replace the properties of a good tyre.

Editor's note: Image rights belong to the respective publisher. Image rights: Touring Club Schweiz/Suisse/Svizzero - TCS


Conclusion of this article: « Winter Tyre Test 2026: Significant Differences in Safety and Durability »


Touring Club Suisse (TCS)


Founded in 1896 in Geneva, the Touring Club Suisse stands in service of the Swiss population. It is committed to safety, sustainability, and self-determination in personal mobility, politically and socially.

With over 2,000 employees and 23 regional sections, the largest mobility club in Switzerland offers its more than 1.6 million members a wide range of services around mobility, health, and leisure activities.

Every 70 seconds, assistance is provided. 200 patrol officers are on the road with about 361,000 deployments on Swiss roads annually, enabling over 80% of the cases for immediate continuation. The ETI centre organises around 63,000 aid operations annually, including 3,500 medical examinations and over 1,300 repatriations. TCS Ambulance is the largest private actor for rescue services and medical transport in Switzerland with 400 employees, 22 logistics bases, and around 45,000 missions per year. The legal protection offices handle 52,000 cases and provide about 10,000 legal consultations.

Since 1908, the TCS has been committed to safer mobility — made possible by membership. It develops teaching materials, awareness, and prevention campaigns, tests mobility infrastructures, and advises authorities. TCS distributes around 115,000 reflective belts and 90,000 reflective vests to children each year to ensure their mobility is safe. 42,000 participants receive training and further education at the driving centres annually in all categories of vehicles.

With 32 sites and about 900,000 overnight stays, the TCS is also the largest camping provider in Switzerland. The TCS Mobility Academy researches and shapes transformations in transport, like vertical mobility of drones or shared mobility, like the 400 electric cargo bikes 'carvelo' and 43,000 users. TCS is a co-signatory to the Roadmap Electromobility 2025.

Note: The "About Us" text is taken from public sources or from the company profile on HELP.ch.

Source: Touring Club Suisse (TCS), Press release

Original article published on: Winterreifentest 2026: Grosse Unterschiede bei Sicherheit und Laufleistung